ReadyPlanet.com
dot dot
dot
ศ.นพ.ทินกร วงศ์ปการันย์
dot
bulletอัตตประวัติ (CV)
bulletPublication on Pubmed
bulletภาพกิจกรรมต่างๆ
dot
แบบวัด (Scales and Measurements)
dot
bulletFamily Climate Questionnaire (FCQ)
bulletSufficiency Economy Scale
bulletType D Personality
bulletChiang Mai DIP-Q
bulletZKA- 40 (Personality Questionnaire; short version)
bulletInternet addiction test_Thai version
bulletCore Symptom Index (CSI)
bulletOutcome Inventory (OI-21)
bulletPathogenic belief scale short version (PBS-27)
bulletPHuSeG scale
bulletRevised Thai Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale
bulletResilience Inventory (RI-9)
bulletScreening instrument for borderline personality disorder (SI-Bord)
bulletinner Strength-Based Inventory (SBI)
bulletThymometer
bulletGroup Cohesiveness Scale (GCS)
bulletUCLA Loneliness Scale / Brief version RULS-6
bulletExperience in Close Relationship (ECR-R-18 and ECR-R-10)
bulletNeuroticism Inventory (NI-15)
bulletTraumatic experience scale (TES)
dot
ลิงค์ที่เกี่ยวข้อง (Links)
dot
bulletหน่วยจิตบำบัด
bulletภาควิชาจิตเวชศาสตร์
bulletชมรมนักจิตบำบัดแห่งประเทศไทย
bulletAmerican Group Psychotherapy Association
bulletDr. Nahathai Wongpakaran's Website
bulletเอกสารการสอน
bulletขอเชิญทำแบบสอบถาม บุคลิกภาพ ZKA
bulletiMMH Bulletin
bulletA CALLING FOR KINDNESS FROM THE WORLD DURING COVID-19
bulletBrief therapy for elderly
bulletMaster Program in Mental Health
bulletdataset for ZKA
dot
เรื่องน่าสนใจ
dot
bulletStrength-Based Therapy (SBT)
bulletทำแบบสอบถาม แบบสำรวจ SURVEY
bulletรักวัวให้ผูก รักลูกให้ใจ
bulletห้องข่าว (News Room)
dot
วารสารแนะนำ
dot


Int J Intercult Relat
Psychiatry Investig


Outcome Inventory (OI-21)

           Outcome Inventory (OI-21) Thai.pdf

 

OI-21 Eng.pdf

(Many thanks to Mr. Justin DeMaranville in back translating for some items) 

OI-21 Chinese version.pdf

OI-21 scoring.pdf

 

 

Outcome Inventory-21 (OI-21)

Reference:  Development and validation of 21-item outcome inventory (OI-21): Heliyon (cell.com)

 

OI-21 เป็นแบบสอบถามที่พัฒนาขึ้นเองโดยทินกร วงศ์ปการันย์และณหทัย วงศ์ปการันย์ สอบถามอาการหลักที่พบบ่อยทางจิตเวช 4 ชนิด ได้แก่ ซึมเศร้า วิตกกังวล อาการทางร่างกาย (somatization) และปัญหาทางสัมพันธภาพ แบบสอบถามนี้มีมาตรวัดแบบ Likert scale โดยผู้ตอบจะให้คะแนนในข้อที่ตรงกับความรู้สึกของตนเองมากที่สุดตั้งแต่ ไม่เลย ไปจนถึง แทบจะตลอด จำนวน 21 ข้อ ผลการทดสอบคุณสมบัติทางจิตวิทยาในนักศึกษา 200 คนผู้ป่วย 150 คน พบว่ามีค่า Cronbach’s α 0.92 มี  ใช้เวลาทำประมาณ 5-10 นาที

OI-21, developed by Tinakon Wongpakaran and Nahathai Wongpakaran, is a 21-item self-report questionnaires, measuring level of anxiety (item 3, 7, 9, 11, 15, 20), depression (items 2, 5, 14, 18, 21) , somatization (items 1, 6, 8, 12, 17, 19) , and interpersonal difficulty (items 4, 10, 13, 16) . It is 5-Likert type response, from “0(never)”  to “4(almost always)”.

Psychometric properties

OI-21 was investigated using confirmatory factor analysis in a mixed sample of 1452 (psychiatric patients and relatives, students, and residents from Juvenile observation and protection center). The mean age of the sample was 26.56 (SD11.47) min-max = 10-87 years, and 63.2% was female. The results showed that the second-order four-solution model was best fitted to the data. The fit statistics were CFI = .957, TLI = .947, RMSEA = .045 (90%CI =.041-.048). Among clinical sample, Cronbach’s alpha for the OI-21 was 0.92; and the Cronbach’s alpha for each sub-scale was 0.80, 0.82, 0.80, and 0.87 for interpersonal difficulty, anxiety, somatization, and depression.

Rasch analysis results show that the combined anxiety-depression subscale fits with the Rasch measurement model. The anxiety-depression subscale was unidimensional ( 1st contrast = 1.80, disattenuated correlation between person measure = .9523), no local dependence, INFIT/OUTFIT MNSQ ranges from  0.84-1.50.  Person SEPARATION = 2.13,  PERSON RELIABILITY  .82, Cronbach’s alpha = .88. Item SEPARATION = 19.61, and ITEM   RELIABILITY = 1.00. No category item or threshold is found.

Coding and scoring

          No reversing values is required before summing up. The OI-21 scores range from 0 to 84.

Interpretation

          In general, the higher the score, the more the symptom were indicated. However, we could use the distribution of scores based on the respective sample. For example, a high vs. low level of anxiety score, or a level of OI-21 among the samples could be grouped in three categories: “low” for scores below the 25th percentile, “average” for scores ranging from the 25th to the 75th percentile and “high” for scores above the 75th percentile.

 Recommendation for use

              Total score of OI-21should be used without the sub-scale of interpersonal difficulty ( only anxiety + depression+ somatization). In another word, the interpersonal difficulty sub-scale should be used separately.  The anxiety - depression sub-scale provides the best reliability and validity especially for follow-up assessment.

          In using OI-21 as an outcome measure, a minimum score to determine change for each symptom (reliable change index) is not yet produced.

    In terms of accuracy of the OI-Depression (OI-Dep) subscale in predicting depression against the gold standard clinical interview diagnosis, we used the area under the ROC curve as the criterion to compare the set of items. In 422 adult clinical sample, the OI-Dep subscale provided the area under the curve of 0.886 denoting good accuracy performance. With the cut-off score of ≥ 7, it yielded a sensitivity of 82.72 and specificity of 78.35, PPV of 76%, and NPV of 84.6%.  

 

 

 

 







Copyright © 2015 All Rights Reserved.