ReadyPlanet.com
dot dot
dot
ศ.นพ.ทินกร วงศ์ปการันย์
dot
bulletอัตตประวัติ (CV)
bulletPublication on Pubmed
bulletภาพกิจกรรมต่างๆ
dot
แบบวัด (Scales and Measurements)
dot
bulletFamily Climate Questionnaire (FCQ)
bulletSufficiency Economy Scale
bulletType D Personality
bulletChiang Mai DIP-Q
bulletZKA- 40 (Personality Questionnaire; short version)
bulletInternet addiction test_Thai version
bulletCore Symptom Index (CSI)
bulletOutcome Inventory (OI-21)
bulletPathogenic belief scale short version (PBS-27)
bulletPHuSeG scale
bulletRevised Thai Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale
bulletResilience Inventory (RI-9)
bulletScreening instrument for borderline personality disorder (SI-Bord)
bulletinner Strength-Based Inventory (SBI)
bulletThymometer
bulletGroup Cohesiveness Scale (GCS)
bulletUCLA Loneliness Scale / Brief version RULS-6
bulletExperience in Close Relationship (ECR-R-18 and ECR-R-10)
bulletNeuroticism Inventory (NI-15)
bulletTraumatic experience scale (TES)
dot
ลิงค์ที่เกี่ยวข้อง (Links)
dot
bulletหน่วยจิตบำบัด
bulletภาควิชาจิตเวชศาสตร์
bulletชมรมนักจิตบำบัดแห่งประเทศไทย
bulletAmerican Group Psychotherapy Association
bulletDr. Nahathai Wongpakaran's Website
bulletเอกสารการสอน
bulletขอเชิญทำแบบสอบถาม บุคลิกภาพ ZKA
bulletiMMH Bulletin
bulletA CALLING FOR KINDNESS FROM THE WORLD DURING COVID-19
bulletBrief therapy for elderly
bulletMaster Program in Mental Health
bulletdataset for ZKA
dot
เรื่องน่าสนใจ
dot
bulletStrength-Based Therapy (SBT)
bulletทำแบบสอบถาม แบบสำรวจ SURVEY
bulletรักวัวให้ผูก รักลูกให้ใจ
bulletห้องข่าว (News Room)
dot
วารสารแนะนำ
dot


Int J Intercult Relat
Psychiatry Investig


Pathogenic belief scale short version (PBS-27)

PBS was developed by the San Francisco Psychotherapy Research Group (SFPRG)( Curtis J, et al. 1994)  The PBS was later modified as self-reporting questionnaires with all statements remaining the same. It totaled 54 statements with three possible responses(Setiati, et al., 2011). The PBS asked the respondents to rate whether or not they agreed with that particular statement. The respondents could choose to answer “no” (1), “uncertain” (2), or “yes” (3), in contrast to a 5- or 6- point Likert scale used in other studies( Silberschatz et. al, 2016; Sammet et al , 2007). 

In terms of psychometric properties, the PBS showed an excellent internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.92 (George Silberschatz & Doorn Aafjes-van, 2016), and being demonstrated as a unidimensional model (A Neelapaijit et al., 2017)The PBS is shortented to 27-item version using Rasch analysis. It showed that 27 of the 54 items met the criteria of the Rasch measurement model, i.e., no misfitting items, no local dependence, and the 27 items demonstrated unidimensionality, and substantial person and item reliability (both greater than 0.80).  Test-retest reliability for the two week interval calculated by intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.65 (p < .001) which indicated moderate reliability(Koo & Li, 2016).

History (Thai version):

PBS Therapist version, 54 item, 7-rating : 2009

PBS-SRv2, Self-report version, 54 item, 3 -rating (Yes, No, not sure):  (Wongpakaran et al., 2010)

PBS-SRv3, Self-report version- extended version, 54 item, 3 -rating (Yes, No, not sure), impact on life :  (Wongpakaran et al. Feb13,2013)

PBS-SRv4, Self-report version- extended version, 27 item, 3 -rating (Yes, No, not sure), impact on life :  (Wongpakaran et al., Sep11,2019)

PBS-27 PBS - 27 SR IV.pdf :  (Wongpakaran et al., 2020) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32382682/

 







Copyright © 2015 All Rights Reserved.